Infringement is an issue for the Tech Giant Facebook as well

Latest News

Infringement is an issue for the Tech Giant Facebook as well

Facebake V/s Facebook row

Delhi High Court has recently restrained the owner of a confectionary named Facebake from using any trademark deceptively similar to that of the social media Tech Giant Meta Platforms, Facebook’s Trademark, permanently. This decision comes after Facebook filed a Trademark Infringement Lawsuit against the confectionary on the grounds of identity theft and plagiarism.

Facebook filed a lawsuit against Facebake

As we all know, the Facebook logo is a well-known trademark worldwide. Anybody can recognize the company’s Trademark from a distance; such is the familiarity with the mascot. Taking advantage of their online presence, as was accused by the Lawsuit, the defendant, Noufel Malol, adopted the overall visual representation of the plaintiff’s logo. The mala fide intent is depicted by the visual similarity and the sound homogeneity of the Confectionary’s and Media company’s Trademark Logo.

Facebake didn’t defend the case; Changed the name to Facecake

One of the reasons for which the judgement was in favour of the Meta company was that Facebake when a lawsuit was filed against it, didn’t defend its Trademark in Court. They didn’t even bother preparing for a defence, but changed the company's name to Facecake. Further, the judge noted that using a mark similar to Facebook could lead to an unwary consumer being interested in taking note of the defendant as having some connection with the plaintiff. He also expressed the mala fide intent of the defendant, which was evident from the interim injunction passed against the use of 'Facebake' and his unwillingness to defend it.

Court’s Analysis of the case

The Court said that in this case, though both the plaintiff and the defendants have some distinguishable features in terms of their branding, but the overall visual representation of the defendants had starking similarity to that of the defendant, which gave the defendant an unfair advantage for using the trademark similar to that of the plaintiff. This could even lead to the dilution of the mark of the plaintiff. Also, it can lead to an unwary consumer being at least interested in taking note of the defendants as having some connection with the plaintiff.

Final Verdict: Tech Giant wins the suit

In their final call, the High Court permanently restrained the defendant and its subsidiaries from using the following:

The Court also awarded damages of 50,000 to the plaintiff and against the defendant.

What worked for Meta in this case of Trademark Infringement?

It is not disputed in the country that the plaintiff's Trademark is well-known in India. Facebook's user base and reach are evident in its online presence for more tha a decade. Nevertheless, the plaintiff alos submitted relevant documents to showcase their presence to further their cause in Court. Also, Facebook has amassed registrations of its marks for various classes of goods. Therefore, using a similar mark without any proper Trademark Assignment procedure would certainly amount to unfair competition. Such irresponsibilities become detrimental to the distinct character of the brand and reputation of the plaintiff's Facebook.

Wanna secure your IPRs against such Infringements? Connect with the Registrationwala

Since you have seen that a Tech Giant like Facebook is also vulnerable to such thefts and plagiarism, then you must move to secure your business against potential Trademark Infringments before you incur any losses to the business. So, make a connect with Registrationwala if you want to safeguard your registered Trademark or register your business’s Trademark in a complete infringement-immune manner.

Categories

Blog Search

Archive

2024

May 2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

January 2024

2023

December 2023

November 2023

October 2023

September 2023

August 2023

July 2023

June 2023

May 2023

April 2023

March 2023

February 2023

January 2023

2022

December 2022

November 2022

October 2022

September 2022

August 2022

July 2022

June 2022

May 2022

April 2022

March 2022

February 2022

January 2022

2021

December 2021

November 2021

October 2021

September 2021

June 2021

May 2021

April 2021

March 2021

February 2021

January 2021

2020

December 2020

November 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

2019

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

2018

December 2018

November 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

February 2018

January 2018

2017

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

December 2016

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

Subscribe to our newsletter